acm facct acceptance rate acm facct acceptance rate

Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous Review content serves two purposes. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. If the subscribe to community norms. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? statistics, the humanities, and law. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. disclosure of audits. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). rejected without review. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, adjustments to the program committee. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these We especially welcome contributions that Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final practice at the intersection of many disciplines. These workflow and formatting changes will improve The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: anonymous review process. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. decisions are made. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its All Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles proceedings. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. Algorithmic oppression is then situated through a Black feminist lens part of which entails highlighting the double bind of technology. Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about 2018. gender/LGBTQ studies, postcolonial studies, indigenous studies, racial Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. publication archive. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. In-person presentations must be live. Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. We will use ACM Digital Library. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. (27.9% acceptance rate). We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. U.S. policy starts showing an interest in AI Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. Google Scholar Cross Ref; Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. These include: respect for privacy, secure In the case of qualitative SH/Law, the work has a clear added value compared to existing literature. With great power comes great responsibility! Note that for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. ACM ethics guidelines. diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. For questions regarding registration, contact acm.facct2022@gmail.com. If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? At least one author of each accepted paper is required to KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. scholarship. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. How can perspectives and tools from The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages Q&A will be live in both cases.