leica m240 vs m262 image quality leica m240 vs m262 image quality

A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. Help us by suggesting a value. . Yes, it adds a Wi-Fi connectivity, which is something completely new in my workflow, but the overall experience is so much simpler. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. : very useful. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. The price is$5195/4050. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. . It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Great article as always! My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. As I understand technically m240 is similar to m262 (only some features, but not sensor). The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. And sometimes they could come in handy. Hes written some good books, too, some with his partner, Frances. Your link has been automatically embedded. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. Overall, I really enjoyed the simplicity of using the 262 which comes very close to the M3 experience in my opinion. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} We were using the Sony cameras for video, so as I often do, I was shooting stills with the Leica. One has a brightline window, the other does not. A M262 is a friendly camera. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. Compared Usage Recommendations More. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. Clear editor. Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. Leica M Typ 240. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. I was once very happy with my M9. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. . Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. . What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. The ideas with Leica is identities. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. In a world where newer camera models are expected to have more features not less, the Leica M262 doesnt really fit into the normal upgrade path camera manufacturers offer. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. I would still rather have the m10 over all the others though, but I definitely see you point. Why torture yourself? Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . I missed his musings in AP. By They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. Some cards are woefully slow. Source: DxOMark. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . Or pictures are completely similar? Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. Thanks a lot for your replies. To a degree, I can see their point too. Display as a link instead, The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. The sensor is not the same, by the way. By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. This happens with the M240 from time to time. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. . A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. Everything is very tactile. The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. And thats pushing it. Privacy policy. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. Equally, Ive not found the dynamic range to be too limited. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. There are two things to be separated here. Ive got a 262 and I really like the fact that its completely stripped back to just the basics. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. You can set minimum shutter speed either specifically, or based on the lens mounted. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. Dont get me wrong Hamish, if I didnt have to give the Taxman an additional sum equal to a Leica M10 last Spring, Id have been tempted! To me this seems like a hassle. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. There is a slight sense that this camera isnt a major model it feels a tiny bit like theres a few too many buttons, and that the body of the camera is a little hollow, but in practice these things go unnoticed. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. I shouldve read the manual! Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. Thanks, James. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Keep forgetting about that. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. I currently own a 262. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. Menu. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. Can you compare side by side, please? Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. To be fair, about 30 days of the last six months had the Leica in intensive care at Leica New Jersey so this is technically five months with the M262. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. I use along the two M240/262/etc. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. RE: the ISO issue. We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. Be the first. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. I wish I did. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. By I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. Literally. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. Great pictures and very interesting. I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. Your link has been automatically embedded. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. But in the context of the fact that functional simplicity is a big part of what attracts people to Leica cameras, its hard not to be impressed by the Leica M262. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . Like most people, I suspect. Got a spare lottery ticket? While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . So I am very glad I got the 240 version. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. It offered a more stripped back feature set than the M240, but it does still have live view. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. I would have bought a 90 Macro lens if I had live view on the camera even though Ive already got a Nikon with 105 Macro. Find out more about 35mmc here. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. The M10 is also very slightly lighter than the M240. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262.